Should We Leave It to Beaver?

Jan 4, 2008 9:11 -
Posted by: Cindy Cotte Griffiths
Department: News
Tags: , , ,

Last year my friend, Dave King, told me that you could see trees taken down >by beavers behind Dogwood Park. His family discovered this during a baseball game. You had to walk down the Monroe Street right-of-way along New Mark and make a left down to the stream. Sure enough when my sons and I went exploring, we saw that a beaver lived in our neighborhood. Several months ago, I saw the beaver at Stoneridge Pond while out jogging.

As autumn arrived and the leaves fell, a white band around a large tree on the far side of the Pond caught my eye. About six small trees disappeared on the opposite side. The Saturday before Christmas, the large tree was down. When we went to see it, there was another large tree also being gnawed.

Initially I was excited about a beaver in my neighborhood, but now I’m wondering if the beaver’s lifestyle is sustainable. If I was down in the park with a chainsaw, I think I’d be in trouble. Our forested areas are limited in the City.

The Montgomery County Parks and Planning website indicates that beavers are a good feature. They clear pockets in the forest and create ponds which attract a variety of wildlife for a diverse ecosystem and their dams help reduce sediment in the water. Beavers are vegetarians and during winter they eat the wood just under the bark. The beavers are just feeding down at the Pond.

Beaver removal companies will only refer to them as “rodents”. These companies detail all the terrible problems created by beavers such as polluted drinking water and lowered property values.

A recent Mark Trail comic strip told the story of a man trying to get rid of the beavers on his property even though his son liked them. Would they be shot? In the end, the beaver pond saves the day during a fire, so the beavers were a good thing.

Having beavers, foxes, coyotes, groundhogs, and raccoons in my neighborhood is enjoyable (notice I didn’t mention the deer) and I love seeing them. All the animals in my neighborhood make Rockville seem even more special, even though some persistent little fellow keeps knocking over my garbage can.

The City has a management company that comes regularly to the pond. I see them testing and treating the water. City workers just drained a section of the Pond into the stream. I’m curious how the beaver fits in with our pond management plan. As they reproduce and spread, will we reforest? Is there a limit to how many trees we are willing to lose?

Post to Twitter

Logged in as . logout »

2 Comments

  1. Todd H.

    It’s a good question, whether or not we should let nature take its course even if it means losing some part of nature that we are trying to protect. I lean toward letting the beavers do their thing to a certain extent–assuming they don’t build a dam that floods I-270 or something.>

    On a related note–we found a possum in our backyard last night. Well, technically our dog found him in a tree went crazy until we came outside and looked for ourselves. I didn’t realize we had possum’s around here. I grew up in Mississippi and they were all over the place, but this is my first possum sighting in Maryland. We tried to get a picture but it was too dark for it to show up well.

    (I guess technically it is spelled opossum when referring to the animal found in the Americas and possum when referring to the one in New Zealand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opossum)

  2. Brad Rourke

    >Burt Hall, the City’s park and recs director, sent me this:

    We have had beavers take up residence in various places around Rockville for decades – mostly along streams within the City parks. This policy was written in the 1980s and has been regularly reviewed by the Recreation and Park Advisory Board. The Board also works with staff to assess particular situations where beaver activity occurs in the parks and help determine how to administer the policy.

    The comment that a human would not be allowed to take a chain saw and cut down trees in the parks speaks to the essence of the issue with beavers. This is a classic case of competing environmental values. Do we protect the trees by trapping and euthanizing the beavers whenever they set up a lodge? Or is the higher value to coexist with the beavers. As you will see the City’s policy is based on an attitude of acceptance of, and tolerance for beaver activity as part of the City’s natural environment. We do hear from residents who feel strongly on both sides of this issue. There are situations in which the City will remove beavers, such as where private property is being flooded, or sewers inundated. Other than that we try to live and let live. By the way, under State law, beavers cannot be re-located. So if the decision is made to trap them, they must be euthanized.

    Thanks Burt!

Search!

Search Rockville Central:




Just type your search term in the box above!


Or, if you want, browse our archives here.

Subscribe!

Subscribe to Rockville Central:

Enter your Email



Free!

You will get one email every night, with links to the latest articles.

Our email includes special deals available ONLY through the newsletter. (Powered by FeedBlitz)


People

Who Is Rockville Central?

Brad Rourke, Founder and Publisher
Cindy Cotte Griffths, Editor

Want to know more? Check out our "About" Page.