Home / What do you think?

Free Advice To Rockville City Candidates

Aug 9, 2007 6:35 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: Opinion,Politics
Tags: , ,

In the spirit of public service, I wanted to offer some free campaign advice to all >candidates. This advice is worth exactly what you are paying for it.

Since the late 1990′s, I have been involved with a nonpartisan candidate training program at UVA’s Sorensen Institute geared towards first-time candidates. I was just a small part of it. The program brings in campaign experts in a variety of areas (mail, polling, communications, GOTV, etc.) who offer their wisdom to a group of mixed Democrat and Republican (and some Indepenendent) candidates. Over the course of a great number of training sessions, I have gleaned a few lessons from listening to the presenters and also from talking with the many, many candidates in the rooms. (Especially the ones who had already lost a race and were trying again.)

In my experience, many people who run for local office seem a little bit daunted by the process. Others go the opposite direction and act as if they are running for President. Neither approach results in a very successful campaign.

Local campaigns should be fun. These are our neighbors, telling us about what they think is important for our communities, and arguing over the best way forward. What could be more of a hoot?

I am offering these tips in the spirit of helfpulness to all candidates. They are not hard-and-fast rules. I am not a campaign consultant; these are just things I have picked up by osmosis along the way. Take them or leave them. Tell me I’m all wet (or think it to yourself).

In no particular order:

  • Most incumbents win re-election. Sorry, it’s true. Challengers have the deck stacked against them. Okay, now you know this. Move on.

  • Most first-time candidates lose. Sorry, it’s true. Persevere anyway.
  • You must know how many votes you need to win. If you do not have a written plan for how you will get that number of votes, you are planning to lose.
  • Know who and where your voters are. Get the voter list. Work it. The person who knocks on the most doors of voters will usually win.
  • If you cannot bring yourself to ask friends and family to make a financial investment in your candidacy, you should seriously rethink whether being a candidate is for you.
  • You cannot be your own campaign manager. Find someone to do it for you. It can be for free. Then, let them do their job.
  • Mailings are worthwhile. Don’t do them too early.
  • Many companies make a lot of money selling unnecessary goods and services to small campaigns. Watch your spending.
  • Lawn signs do not help you get elected. Put up only enough to seem credible. Don’t be a jerk: Take them down after the election.
  • Don’t buy emery boards, pot holders, magnets, or hats. They are a waste. T-shirts are only good if you can get a number of supporters to wear them at the same time. (Like at a parade.) Don’t give them away; supporters should pay for them.
  • Buttons are nice for the wearer, but little stickers get the job done just as well for cheaper.
  • Television and radio advertising for local candidates is generally not worthwhile. You can’t afford enough repetition to make a dent and you don’t know you are reaching actual voters.
  • You need only the bare minimum on the Web; do not spend time and resources on a fancy web site.
  • Know who the two or three reporters who are covering your race are. Treat them with respect and get to know them. Remember their job is to write news stories, not just publish your press releases.
  • Do not ever, ever lie. You will be found out.
  • Know and follow all the rules and laws. Make sure there is someone paying attention to that for you…but you are responsible.
  • Google yourself twice a day, morning and night. Study your opponents’ web sites.
  • Don’t get caught up in the excitement of speaking to large groups of people unless you know for sure they are possible voters in your district. It does you no good to ask voters in another district to vote for you.
  • Always present yourself as if you are in office. People expect you to look like a grown-up. Dress up a little. Don’t wear goofy stuff.
  • At receptions and events, don’t be photographed with a glass in your hand.
  • Always thank people and be gracious.
  • If you are going to be on TV, do not wear a white shirt.
  • Yes, issues matter, but people are voting for a person. Let them get to know you. Don’t hide behind a bunch of white papers and position statements.

Well, that’s about it. If you have other ideas, or disagree, please just post in the comment section. Let’s make this a dialogue…and a resource.

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Rockville Town Square Dedication Today

Jul 17, 2007 7:21 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: Opinion
Tags: ,

>Today at 10 am at the Rockville Town Square, luminaries and dignitaries will be on hand for the official dedication of the new centerpiece of our city. Go to Town Square and you will see Governor O’Malley, our Mayor and City Council, and others.

Our friends at the Norfolk (Virginia) Examiner have chosen this day to release a story whose essence is that Town Square has gotten mixed reviews. On the one hand, it’s been a wild success in terms of visitors:

From a standpoint of attracting people to downtown Rockville, the 12.5-acre Rockville Town Center has been a big success. Hundreds can be spotted dining, shopping or gathering at nearly every time of day.

But, says the Examiner

[R]esidents are voicing skepticism about the ability to pay back the money used to build new parking garages. Merchants also have said that construction problems along the way have hampered businesses’ success since the first shops opened in February.

Construction problems are nothing new, and are valid complaints. But they sure don’t condemn the whole project. In a facility this size, with so many different facets, it would be a surprise if there weren’t complaints about how smoothly construction had gone.

As for the parking complaint, I would like to know more about just what it means. “Government is supposed to provide improvements that help all citizens,” one Rockville resident is quoted. “How do parking garages satisfy all residents?” To me, it’s part of infrastructure — it would have been crazy to have built something of this size without parking. By keeping 1,000 cars off of streetside parking, the garages sure do satisfy me.

But, that’s all just my opinion. I am a Town Square booster. I am proud of it and spend time there. I patronize its businesses.

I know there was a lot of controversy around its even getting built, so there are a lot of ill feelings towards its very existence. But, whether you supported it or not, here it is. People are coming to it from around the region.

Let’s make it work.

What do you think?

(Photo by Carson)

Post to Twitter

Revolution In Rockville?

Jul 11, 2007 8:26 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: News,Opinion,Politics
Tags:

>

I felt certain I was reading a dispatch from the satiric weekly The Onion when I read this from an outfit called InfoShop News:

In an attempt to discover how . . . the US Air Force enjoy finding themselves on the other end of some flying projectiles for a change, at around 3:00 AM this morning an autonomous cell of the Red & Anarchist Action Network (RAAN) used bricks and other common household items to smash the s*** out of the Air Force recruiting center in Rockville, Maryland.

An “autonomous cell?” Since I went to school in Berkeley, California, I know things can get pretty funny when the communists and anarchists try to work together. They are just from such fundamentally different places (anarchists want no government; communists want more government). I wrote a piece about the foibles of protest a few months back.

But I was curious, I smelled a news item, and the recruiting center was on my way this morning, so I stopped to check. The photo above tells the story: it looked like nothing was amiss. It was very early, so the place was closed. I saw no sign of trouble. Was the notice just a joke?

But then, ‘way up in the corner, I noticed something. Two small dents in the window, with something that looked like red clay…as if from a brick…embedded in one. Wow. They really had tried to “smash the s***” out of the windows, but had evidently failed.

I am not sure this means we have a budding revolutionary cell (RAAN?) in our midst, or that there is a group of four or five kids who have little to do on a summer night. Or both.

I do know that, since we have an all-volunteer force, vandalsim at an armed services recruiting center seems silly to me. The people at that office want to be there. It’s nothing like the Sixties-era protests at induction centers, which were taking people to war against their will. I am not making a point for or against the war in Iraq. I’m saying that, in my opinion, in today’s context, a recruitment center just doesn’t work as a place to make a political statement. Try disrupting a speech, instead.

Well, I hope this doesn’t embolden our local autonomous cell of the RAAN to escalate. More for their sake than for the stability of the Establishment. If they got serious, they could wind up in real trouble. They may think that’s what they want, but it probably isn’t.

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Planning Chair Frowns on Whining

Jun 20, 2007 16:08 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: News,Opinion,Politics
Tags: , ,

The Gazette >tells us that Steven Johnson, Rockville Planning Commission chair, is irked at the “tiresome” complaints about the a-borning Twinbrook Neighborhood Plan lodged by Twinbrook Citizens Association President Christina Ginsberg, Saying of them that they are “a bit of a whine.”

Comments such as that by city officials (even volunteers) about citizens are unfortunate. But there is a larger issue at work here, too.

At issue appears to be a classic staff/citizen rift. The Planning Commisssion, says Ginsberg, does not provide information timely and slants its questionnaires so that they will result in positive assessments of the current draft plans. Meanwhile, the Commission seems to believe, citizens are not giving them enough room and flexibility in which to make plans — demanding answers about zoning that would come out later in the process.

Each side has an understandable interest: planning in a way that is most beneficial to Rockville as a whole (on the one hand); and really knowing what is going to happen in the neighborhood moving forward (on the other).

It’s too bad that the very mechansim that is supposed to minimize such friction — commuity outreach , that is — appears to be the very thing that is causing it.

Who knows how this process will move forward. But, in the future, people who are designing such mechanisms would do well to really ask, as they go about this important work, just what is it we are after? “Input” that we will then do with as we will? Or a real understanding of the concerns and aspirations of the community?

While we all might quickly say it’s the latter we are after, we need to make sure our plans and actions don’t send the message that we really just want the former (and that only grudgingly).

One way to approach this is to ask: What would it really look like if we went about planning in partnership with the community, rather than just seeking “input?”

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Mixed Review for Greystone Grill

Jun 17, 2007 6:13 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: News
Tags: , , ,

This weekend, the >Washington Post has a decidedly mixed review of the Greystone Grill, one of Town Center’s new fine dining offerings.

The good:
It has the look all right: eponymous stone hearths; a cool, impressive black boulder of a fountain; a good mix of banquettes and tables; and a couple of comfy armchair groupings in the lounge. . . . [S]ome meals rise to the occasion. The pork tenderloin was cooked precisely to order and not overseasoned. Pecan-crusted tilapia was good (one diner got three filets instead of two), though the peach-mango chutney was cloyingly sweet. . . . Other strong points included the hot hearth rolls (not house-made but fresh-baked), in a time when good table bread is rare. The chilled seafood cocktail was nice: shrimp, lump crab and a couple of pretty lobster claws, all precisely cooked.

 
Less good:
Greystone Grill is not ready for prime time, at least not full time. . . . Service is undoubtedly well-intentioned . . . but can be incredibly slow even on nights when the staff outnumbers the clientele. Ordering mistakes and omissions are unhappily frequent, and the cooking is erratic. . . . [I]t has acquired a Jekyll-Hyde reputation of stepping to and slacking off.

On the other hand, many like Greystone a great deal. One testimonial from their website: “Wow! We just had dinner at the GreystoneGrill–it was absolutely fabulous!!! Our service was excellent –Sarah was our waitress. And everyone was very helpful. The food was superb–we were very impressed, even my very particular husband who likes his tuna just so. Thank you so much! All your hard work has obviously paid off!” — Amy T.

I have not yet dined at Greystone, but I plan to soon.

Have you eaten there? What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Sex Ed Curriculum Passes MCPS School Board

Jun 13, 2007 6:05 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: News,Politics
Tags: , ,

As expected, the Montgomery County >school board approved a new sex education curriculum for use in 8th and 10th grades. Our own Julius West Middle School was a test site for the curriculum, which adds two 45-minute lessons to the year and has been the subject of a great deal of controversy.

The curriculum got a last-minute change from schools superintendent Jerry Weast, who added a provision that called for teachers, only if asked by students, to point out that the psychiatric profession does not consider homosexuality to be a disease. (Without the provision, teachers would have been instructed to encourage the student to ask a “trusted adult” about the matter.)

In a comprehensive article announcing the vote, the Washington Post says:

Much of the nation is moving toward an “abstinence-only” approach to sex education, which emphasizes the advantages of confining sex to marriage. But school systems in liberal communities are heading in the opposite direction, teaching more about sexual orientation, as well as contraception and abstinence, in what is termed “comprehensive” sex education.

Sex ed has always been a contentious issue. It goes to core beliefs about how — and what — we want to pass on to our children, and under what conditions. If the Post is right, there is an added “culture war” overlay too.

It seems clear that, even though the vote is over and done, the disputes will continue on.

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Duncan Library?

Jun 7, 2007 6:34 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: News,Politics
Tags: , , ,

If you read the Gazette or the Washington Post, >you know it is possible that the new library in Rockville Town Center could be named for the former Montgomery County executive and former Rockville mayor (and West End resident) Doug Duncan.

The new MoCo executive, Ike Leggett, is set to make the decision after a board (stacked, critics say, with Duncan supporters) has recommended to go with the name. This would make it one of the few libraries in the county that has a person’s name affixed (usually they are named after the place they are) and Leggett would have to waive a county policy that requires people for whom buildings are named to have been away from public service for at least five years.

[edit] According to WaPo, “Duncan backers said that he was a supporter of public libraries and that he increased funding, expanded library hours and fought for state money for the Rockville project during his 12 years in office.” [/edit]

Critics say that Duncan did not push hard enough, when MoCo executive, for library funding and so it would be wrong to name a library after him. Among alternatives that have been proposed is “Rockville Memorial Library,” to honor fallen soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Retreat This

Jun 6, 2007 7:06 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: Opinion
Tags: , , ,

A retreat to re-establish trust and clear the air among our bickering city council members has been scheduled for August 17, the >Gazette reports that city manager Scott Ullery confirms.

I am all for members of government bodies to get along. But I question the wisdom of the Rockville City Council trying to “retreat” in the midst of an election campaign that will be getting hot (Sept. 7 is the deadline to file as a candidate) and which includes an open mayoral seat. It will be hard for council members to check their self-interest at the door under such conditions.

Better to do something like this shortly after taking office in an even year, when election pressures have not yet mounted. Granted, this summer’s retreat is in part designed to make up for one held February 2006 — which Councilwoman Robbins did not attend for medical reasons.

Yes, there has been acrimony and division. But as the term ends and campaign-time begins is probably not the most effective time to try to bury the hatchet.

Maybe I am wrong. What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Trash Day

Jun 4, 2007 6:20 -
Posted by: Brad Rourke
Department: News
Tags: , ,

It’s trash day on my block. Last week we didn’t have pickup because of Memorial Day. It made me recall the ongoing argument over >switching from twice-per-week trash pickup to once-per-week.

I am in favor of once-per-week. Two times a week is a waste of resources, in my view.

What about you? What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Search!

Search Rockville Central:




Just type your search term in the box above!


Or, if you want, browse our archives here.

Subscribe!

Subscribe to Rockville Central:

Enter your Email



Free!

You will get one email every night, with links to the latest articles.

Our email includes special deals available ONLY through the newsletter. (Powered by FeedBlitz)


People

Who Is Rockville Central?

Brad Rourke, Founder and Publisher
Cindy Cotte Griffths, Editor

Want to know more? Check out our "About" Page.